Manchester United took a significant step towards securing the services of goalkeeper Andre Onana this week by submitting an opening bid of £38.5 million. However, Inter Milan, has set their price for the goalkeeper at around £50 million. The 27-year-old Cameroon international, joined Inter last summer on a five-year deal after his successful time with Ajax.
Negotiations to sign Andre Onana are reaching an advanced stage, signaling that the deal is close to completion.
Manchester United and the player have successfully agreed upon personal terms, demonstrating a shared desire to move forward with the transfer. With Manchester United aiming to finalize the deal in time for Onana to join the squad in time to travel for their pre-season in the United States.
The transfer is anticipated to be finalized in the coming week, signaling a potential new addition to Manchester United's goalkeeping department. With criticism aimed at their our of contract goalkeeper, David de Gea, for his footwork and distribution, the acquisition of Andre Onana would provide Manchester United with a modern goalkeeper who is highly regarded, much like Manchester City's Ederson.
Onana himself has emphasized his abilities as a goalkeeper, stating, "Goalkeepers are asked to be an additional outfield player, and I believe that I really stand out in this regard, playing with my feet, keeping the ball on the ground, displaying character, and above all, transmitting the right sense of confidence to the team."
Meanwhile, David de Gea's contract situation adds an additional layer of intrigue.
As his contract with Manchester United came to an end making him a free agent, teams from the Saudi Pro League are reportedly expressing interest in acquiring the experienced shot-stopper, potentially opening up new possibilities for the Spanish goalkeeper.
As developments unfold in this transfer saga, Manchester United fans eagerly await the finalization of the deal and the potential impact Andre Onana could bring to Manchester United's Sqaud especially at the back.
Commentaires